Worql assembles the contracts behind US-India software work.

When a US company hires an Indian software team for project work, two things are already handled well.

• Moving money across the borderSolved
• Hiring full-time, compliantlySolved
• The engagement itselfThe gap

The scope, who owns the IP, what counts as delivered, and the contract that governs all of it still run on email threads, generic templates, and slow legal cycles. That's where most of the friction lives, and where trust between the two sides tends to break.

Worql assembles a SoW from a structured clause library built for this corridor.

• IP assignment
• India data-protection (DPDP)
• Remittance & FEMA terms
• Milestones & acceptance

Built in from the start, not bolted on after.

E-signature is part of the flow, so the document goes out and comes back signed without a second tool.

The point isn't to remove your lawyer. It's to handle the routine contracts with a lot less lawyer back-and-forth, and to hand counsel a far cleaner starting point when you do bring them in. It's live today at worql.app.

The contract is just the start. The harder problem in this corridor is the rest of the engagement: knowing that the work that was scoped actually got delivered, and having a shared, honest record of it that both sides trust.

That's the direction Worql is building toward. Two-sided, evidence over verdict, useful to the vendor and the client alike.

I'm building Worql because of repeated failed software outsourcing engagements. It's what I wish I'd had the first time I outsourced. The same things came up every time: scope that drifts, IP terms nobody's certain about, contracts that take weeks.

The legal and operational stack for this corridor is unusually specific, and almost nobody is building for it directly. So I am.